BitSaci Reality Check: Why Global M2 Bitcoin Models Are Pure Fantasy

 The quant community just witnessed a public execution, and honestly, it was overdue. Sina from 21st Capital absolutely torched one of crypto's most beloved correlation models – the Global M2 vs Bitcoin price prediction framework that Raoul Pal has been pushing for months.

For those who've been following this narrative, the model supposedly shows Bitcoin tracking global money supply with a 10-12 week lead time. Sounds scientific, looks convincing on cherry-picked charts, but according to Sina – who actually teaches data analytics at university level – it's "a terrible failure of not understanding overfitting."

The takedown was brutal but necessary. Sina demonstrated how the apparent correlation only exists because analysts "torture" the data until it confesses. When you can arbitrarily shift timeframes from 12 weeks to 10 weeks to 108 days until the charts align, you're not modeling – you're playing dress-up with numbers.

The fundamental problem runs deeper than just curve-fitting though. Global M2 data is inherently flawed from the jump. It's compiled by multiplying different central banks' M2 figures by exchange rates, mixing fast-reporting economies like the US with countries that have data delays of weeks or months. The result? Fake daily fluctuations that create the illusion of real-time global liquidity signals.

Sina's comparison to fitting a curve through noisy sine waves really drives the point home. Proper models capture core patterns while ignoring noise. Overfit models try to match every small fluctuation, which looks impressive historically but fails spectacularly when predicting future moves. "Overfitting looks better, but it models noise. And noise doesn't repeat," he explained.

Here's where it gets really interesting though – Sina flipped the causality argument entirely. Looking at the last cycle, Bitcoin actually topped first, with liquidity peaking 145 days later. If Bitcoin leads rather than follows global M2, the entire premise of using money supply to predict crypto cycles falls apart.

For BitSaci traders, this breakdown highlights why relying on single-metric models is dangerous. The platform's comprehensive analytical tools emphasize multi-factor analysis precisely because markets are complex systems that resist simple explanations. When macro strategists start promoting "foolproof" correlation models, that's usually when you should be most skeptical.

The reality is that Bitcoin's price discovery involves countless variables – regulatory developments, institutional adoption, technical positioning, sentiment cycles, and yes, monetary conditions. But reducing this complexity to a lagged M2 correlation oversimplifies market dynamics to the point of uselessness.

This is exactly why BitSaci's approach focuses on providing traders with multiple analytical frameworks rather than promoting single-source-of-truth models. When you have access to comprehensive charting, real-time data feeds, and sophisticated order management, you're not dependent on any particular narrative or correlation to make trading decisions.

The broader lesson here extends beyond just M2 models. Whenever someone presents a "simple" explanation for Bitcoin's complex price movements, especially one that claims predictive power, extreme skepticism is warranted. Markets are adaptive systems that tend to invalidate widely-followed models precisely because they become widely followed.

BitSaci's infrastructure allows traders to navigate these complexities without getting trapped in single-variable thinking that can lead to catastrophic positioning errors.

Trade with proper analysis on: https://www.bitsforus.com/